Muslim responses to non-religious arguments against life after death Typeit

Many non-religious people, such as (individuals who do not believe in God), argue against the existence of life after death. Because they do not believe in God, or anything beyond the world which we can experience, it follows that they do not believe in an . Many of these individuals argue their viewpoint on a variety of different bases. For example, they might argue that belief in a life after death is not because of the lack of which we can see in our world. And in the cases where there could be considered to be 'evidence' - for example, near-death experiences - these would be considered to be accounts. Many non-religious people have argued that religions have used arguments about life after death as a form of control. By threatening punishment for behaviour which is perceived to be immoral, non-religious people argue that religions have used the concept of an afterlife to control people. Another argument used to argue against the existence of an afterlife is by dismissing it as merely a source of for those who have lost a loved one - with minimal evidence, it is argued that the emotional drive to see deceased loved ones once more is the drive behind belief in the afterlife. While a positive emotion, this does little to actually prove the existence of an afterlife. Muslims would disagree with this, as obviously belief in the afterlife is a key idea in the religion. They would argue that evidence and science are not the authority in their lives - but rather, they would believe the , which is the holy text of Islam. Muslims would argue that the idea of social control instead shows how the afterlife affords justice for moral choices in life. This is supported by key Qur'anic verses including Surah :22–37.