Our site uses cookies. Some of the cookies we use are essential for parts of the site to operate and have already been set. You may delete and block all cookies from this site, but parts of the site will not work. To find out more about cookies on this website, see our Cookie Policy
Accept
© eRevision.uk and ZigZag Education 2025
This test is run by .
Note that your final mark will not be saved in the system.

Arguments Against the Existence of God GapFill

Target Level
4-5
Running Total
0
0%
Attempt
1 of 3

You must fill all the gaps before clicking ‘Check Answers!’

Including the objections given to the First  CauseEventGodPower Argument and the  DesignProofCreationCause Argument, there are various other arguments  againstproposingforchampioning the existence of God. One of the key arguments opposing the existence of God is that of the Problem of  DisappointmentEvilSadnessBrokenness and Suffering. This problem is based on human experience of the world. The idea of a God that is omnipotent (which means  all-knowingall-presentall-powerfulall-vengeful) and omnibenevolent (which means  all-presentall-lovingall-hatingall-powerful) is inconsistent with the suffering and pain we can observe in the world. If God is loving, is able to see suffering, and has the power to end suffering, then surely there would be no suffering? A lot of people would argue that this proves  repliestheodiciesargumentsexpositions such as the  ChoicesLimitationsSufferingFree Will Defence. There are also arguments which have come from the modern development of  equipmentscienceideasreason as it is through this endeavour that we have been able to see evidenced explanations for events which had previously been explained by the existence of a God. One such example is the Big  SoundClashShiftBang Theory for the creation of the universe. This used to be explained by God, as it was accepted that God had created the world. However, it is important to note that many religious people do accept the modern findings of  reasonequipmentsciencethoughts and do not consider these to conflict with their faith. For these people, they consider science to offer the explanation of  whyhowwhatwho things happened, whereas religion offers the  whywhatwhowhen.

This is your 1st attempt! You get 3 marks for each one you get right. Good luck!

Pass Mark
72%