Our site uses cookies. Some of the cookies we use are essential for parts of the site to operate and have already been set. You may delete and block all cookies from this site, but parts of the site will not work. To find out more about cookies on this website, see our Cookie Policy
Accept
© eRevision.uk and ZigZag Education 2025
This test is run by .
Note that your final mark will not be saved in the system.

Checks and Balances Categorise

Target Level
C
Running Total
0
0%
Attempt
1 of 1

Click on an item, then click on a category to place it. Or, drag and drop the item into the correct category. Organise all items before clicking 'Check'.

The Supreme Court is too powerful.
The Supreme Court is not too powerful.

The justices are establishment figures who are likely to rule in favour of the status quo.
Justices are increasingly prone to judicial activism.
It can rule only on cases and issues that have been brought before it.
Its rulings can appear to challenge parliamentary sovereignty.
It provides citizens with a greater means to challenge the actions of government.
The independence of the justices means they hard to control and do not respond to political pressure. 
Landmark rulings can set long-lasting precedents in law and be difficult to overturn.
It cannot simply overturn a law but instead only declare it incompatible with other laws.
Its rulings are often simply based on laws passed by Parliament.
The justices are not elected yet can significantly contribute to overturning an Act of Parliament.

This is your 1st attempt! You get 1 marks for each one you get right first time. Good luck!

Pass Mark
70%